National Public Radio (NPR) video Case Author`s Name

Institution`s Name
National Public Radio (NPR) video Case Study
The video was created by James O`Keefe, GOP Provocateur, whose organization deceived Mr. Schiller by hosting a lunch for him and sharing what he stated were his personal viewpoints. In fact, as a result of video recording, James O`Keefe generated intentionally deceptive video clipping to smear his political foes.
Following are some of the blatant distortion O`Keefe devised:
1. O`Keefe`s video showed NPR`s Ron Schiller as gladly enthusiastic to take an endowment from a Muslim group.
2. The edited video portrayal Schiller is reacting favorably in the discussion regarding the Muslim canonical law. The video displays that the response was deed to a different subject completely. It was just edited to make it seem as if he was responding to the discussion of Muslim law.
3. The video showed Schiller being unfriendly towards the Republicans.
4. The video portrayed Schiller criticizes the Tea Party as racialist.
5. The edited video portrayed Schiller degrading the cleverness of conservatives.
6. The video showed Schiller claims that federal funding for NPR was not required or wanted.
Case Analysis
Whether the attempt by O`Keefe`s through secret video is lawful investigation or a political gimmick, it is going to be applied more commonly, since it has proved to be quite successful. The government figures seemed to be going to be a lot more cautious regarding talking to visitors and their workforce is going to be more careful regarding studying people they discuss with.
An analysis of the video by the well-known website The Blaze evaluated the edited version with the video cast doubts on about O`Keefe`s tactics, however also about the other media organizations that covered the story.
In the analysis, Ron Schiller`s remarked that Tea Party members were “critically racist,” as he was describing the viewpoints of Republicans he has discussed with — though he did not seem to differ. As well, it also showed Schiller appeared to be mocking the possible spread of Islamic laws, when the full version of the video showed he responded to something entirely different.
O`Keefe stated that the whole video which he tried to take credit for making public did not refute anything in the edited version of the video. He noted that the NPR executive, Ron Schiller, did not dispute the video rather apologized for that.
O`Keefe was of the view that all the correspondents cautiously edited their reporting of the video with the focus on the egregious accounts made by their subjects. As a result of the video, he was behaving much more clearly and bluntly than any other correspondents narrating their views.
O`Keefe mentor Andrew Breitbart categorically supported O`Keefe`s tactics, stated he showed the unedited tapes to offer the context. He was of the view that the video was more than key news media outlets and TV networks have accomplished after their own secret reporting.
As the opponents claimed, NPR was not basically a news channel however an outlet of a liberal program – a view intensified by Schiller`s condemnation of the Tea Party as “racist” and commented that liberals in the present times might be more well-informed, just and balanced in their outlook than the conservatives.
The political motivation however, at the back the hidden camera is quite inciting to spark more debates regarding NPR`s alleged predisposition, at a time when the legislators and politicians are seeking to stop funding for public outlets. As stated in a Los Angeles Times editorial on 3[rd] November, 2011: `NPR long has attracted grievances from conservatives that it has a liberal predisposition. As to confirm that viewpoint, a senior NPR fundraising official has offered the network`s opponents with undreamed-of ammunition. In particular, NPR needs to remember its responsibility as a recipient of government grants to be balanced and non-partisan.` This is precisely what O`Keefe and others like him wanted. However, anyone writing about what the video “appears to confirm” should consider themselves to a better standard
In spite of the prevalence of such claims, little data have ever been shown for a left predisposition at NPR, and there was not any study that gives support for it. Considering the partisan data – comprising of government bureaucrats, politicians, activists and advisors the GOP exceeded the Democrats by more than 3 to 2.
Bill Moyers and Michael Winship wrote:
“Ron Schiller was a fund raiser who no longer worked for them. He had no assignment with the decision making process. In addition, frankly, the editorial honesty speaks for itself. They have a group of correspondents that are placed globally, and have been able to win all types of prizes, and there is an ombudsman who is dedicated to examining the editorial working. If anybody thinks the reporting is spoiled or untrustworthy, that implies their personal viewpoints, and they are free to express it to look for the proof. They would not be bullied by the extensive secret hackwork of spiteful political point-scorers who are committed to see NPR to doom” (Moyers & Winship, 2011).
O`Keefe applied the editing tactics that intentionally designed to lie or mislead the readers about the text being presented. He erroneously edited the videos with the aim to discredit NPR. However, Schiller made some flagrant statements that made the complex case.
Montopoli, B. (2011). Should NPR lose its federal funding? CBS News.
Moyers, B. & Winship, M. (2011). In defense of NPR. Columbia Journalism Review.

Close Menu